» » Crash Course In Science - Flying Turns
Crash Course In Science - Flying Turnsh1
Electronic
Performer: Crash Course In Science
Title: Flying Turns
Style: New Wave, Techno, Minimal, Tech House
Year 2009
Country Germany
Genre: Electronic
Rating: 4.6
Votes: 637
MP3 size: 1801 mb
FLAC size: 1991 mb
WMA size: 1124 mb
Other formats: MOD AA WAV MIDI MP3 TTA AUD

Crash Course In Science - Flying Turns mp3 album


Crash Course In Science - Flying Turns mp3 album

Tracklist Hide Credits

A1 Flying Turns (Terence Fixmer Remix)
Remix – Terence Fixmer
A2 Flying Turns (Original Mix)
B1 Flying Turns (Danton Eeprom Remix)
Remix – Danton Eeprom
B2 Flying Turns (Ccis Remix)
Remix – Ccis*

Barcode and Other Identifiers

  • Barcode: 3700534000534
  • Other (Rights Societies): SACEM/SDRM

Other versions

Category Artist Title (Format) Label Category Country Year
PTX 005 B Crash Course In Science Flying Turns ‎(12", RE) Pressure Traxx PTX 005 B Germany 2014
PTX 005 Crash Course In Science Flying Turns ‎(12", Ltd, Pic) Pressure Traxx PTX 005 Germany 2013


Zulurr
I have a "Test Pressing"that is "Made by MPO"Does anyone know something about this so called Test Pressing?
Shazel
I haven't found an option, but can somebody please divide the pressure trax release from the one on jupiter! Different remixes, different label. So the pressure trax release is not identifiable/to be seen in the CCIS discography. It should be a separate release. Thanks.
TheMoonix
well put in words deep transit. i totally agree.
Deeroman
Sorry to the Remix-Boys on that release, but the real remix of "Flying Turns" in 2009 exits on the "Medusa Edits 006";this sound is like stepping back to the 80´s to the Original with the techniques/Synthies/Experiences and Worldview of today. Jamal Moss is not doing only an remix charge, he is living in that sound. While giving the Electro Clash a new definition from the underground.
Eigeni
Music-wise I agree. BUT - saying that CCIS don't understand the vibe of their own music (B2 is a remix on themself) leaves me breathless. I belong to the community of late born lovers of music of that early eighties era, but I'm very aware that I dive into some nerd romanticism, some misinterpreting, a vintage that wasn't vintage at its time. It was avantgarde and CCIS are saying todays people do understand their music better than during their concerts back then. If we really wanna follow their path and update their approach we should do like Gary Numan (who also is a victim of retro-romanticism) said - using any and the latest technology to go ahead of the front, as he felt working with field recordings and synths 30 years ago, and finally become material for the crate diggers of tomorrow. Probably CCIS are one generation too old to do it themselves today. Well, actually we - who are into the Jamal Moss kind of understanding - don't want to be avantgarde sound-wise, we wanna comfortably dig the past and edit on it and that's how I can accept myself.Some might get baffled by getting to know that Jamal is doing his sounds on his ipad-apps if it helps.And - I said music-wise I agree. :)